Prototype·Built by Concourse for Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
← Back to project
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
State Parks Building · 1100 W Washington St · Phoenix, AZ 85007 · shpo@azstateparks.gov
Prototype letterhead — generated by SHOPP
March 24, 2026
WestLand Resources (synthetic)
Attn: contact231@example.gov
RE: Section 106 Consultation, Post-wildfire BAER — Maricopa Co. Phase II
SHPO File: PRJ-2026231 · Maricopa County, AZ
Received: 3/24/2026 · Deadline: 4/23/2026

Dear contact231@example.gov:

The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed your post-wildfire baer submission for the above-referenced undertaking pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.

Project description. SYNTHETIC demonstration record. Post-wildfire BAER submitted by WestLand Resources (synthetic).

Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE includes a polygon of approximately 103.25 km² centered at 33.3715°, -111.5323° in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Federal nexus. The APE intersects the following surface management jurisdictions: Private Land (Private); State Trust Land (State); Tonto N.F (USFS).

Flood hazard. The APE intersects FEMA flood zone(s) X, D.

Identified historic properties. No NRHP-listed properties were identified within the APE based on the submitted documentation and our current geospatial data.

Section 4(f) considerations. 4 pre-1945 bridge(s) lie within 5 km of the APE; ADOT and FHWA Section 4(f) eligibility should be confirmed prior to construction.

ADOT historic / scenic route(s). Apache Trail Historic Route; Picacho to Cooliddge to Chandler to Mesa to Payson to Winslow; Quartzsite to Wickenburg to Phoenix to Globe to Show Low to Springerville; Apache Trail Historic Route.

Determination. Based on the foregoing, SHPO concurs with a finding of NO ADVERSE EFFECT pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5.

This determination is non-final until concurrence is received from all consulting parties. Should the scope of the undertaking change, please resubmit for re-review per 36 CFR 800.13.

Sincerely,

M. Tso
reviewer · Arizona SHPO
This letter was auto-drafted by SHOPP using the unified GIS layer set and the project’s submitted polygon. Final review and signature by the assigned reviewer is required before issuance.