Prototype·Built by Concourse for Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
← Back to project
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
State Parks Building · 1100 W Washington St · Phoenix, AZ 85007 · shpo@azstateparks.gov
Prototype letterhead — generated by SHOPP
March 25, 2026
AZ Dept of Emergency Mgmt
Attn: contact13@example.gov
RE: Section 106 Consultation, Prescribed burn — Maricopa Co. Phase II
SHPO File: PRJ-2026013 · Maricopa County, AZ
Received: 3/25/2026 · Deadline: 4/24/2026

Dear contact13@example.gov:

The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed your prescribed burn submission for the above-referenced undertaking pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.

Project description. SYNTHETIC demonstration record. Prescribed burn submitted by AZ Dept of Emergency Mgmt.

Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE includes a polygon of approximately 100.79 km² centered at 35.3873°, -112.1111° in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Federal nexus. The APE intersects the following surface management jurisdictions: Private Land (Private); State Trust Land (State); Kaibab N.F (USFS).

Flood hazard. The APE intersects FEMA flood zone(s) X.

Identified historic properties. The following NRHP-listed or eligible properties lie within or adjacent to the APE:

  • Laws Spring (NRIS 84000645)5.83 km from APE centroid.

Section 4(f) considerations. 1 pre-1945 bridge(s) lie within 5 km of the APE; ADOT and FHWA Section 4(f) eligibility should be confirmed prior to construction.

ADOT historic / scenic route(s). Williams to Grand Canyon to Cameron Highway.

Determination. Based on the foregoing, SHPO concurs with a finding of NO ADVERSE EFFECT pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5. Stipulations to protect contributing resources during construction shall be incorporated into the project design and monitored by a qualified historic preservation specialist.

This determination is non-final until concurrence is received from all consulting parties. Should the scope of the undertaking change, please resubmit for re-review per 36 CFR 800.13.

Sincerely,

A. Whitman
reviewer · Arizona SHPO
This letter was auto-drafted by SHOPP using the unified GIS layer set and the project’s submitted polygon. Final review and signature by the assigned reviewer is required before issuance.