Prototype·Built by Concourse for Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
← Back to project
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
State Parks Building · 1100 W Washington St · Phoenix, AZ 85007 · shpo@azstateparks.gov
Prototype letterhead — generated by SHOPP
April 2, 2026
WestLand Resources (synthetic)
Attn: contact68@example.gov
RE: Section 106 Consultation, 5G tower siting — Maricopa Co. Phase I
SHPO File: PRJ-2026068 · Maricopa County, AZ
Received: 4/2/2026 · Deadline: 5/2/2026

Dear contact68@example.gov:

The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed your 5g tower siting submission for the above-referenced undertaking pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.

Project description. SYNTHETIC demonstration record. 5G tower siting submitted by WestLand Resources (synthetic).

Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE includes a polygon of approximately 105.30 km² centered at 31.5988°, -110.7005° in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Federal nexus. The APE intersects the following surface management jurisdictions: Private Land (Private); Coronado N.F (USFS).

Flood hazard. The APE intersects FEMA flood zone(s) X, D.

Identified historic properties. No NRHP-listed properties were identified within the APE based on the submitted documentation and our current geospatial data.

Section 4(f) considerations. 3 pre-1945 bridge(s) lie within 5 km of the APE; ADOT and FHWA Section 4(f) eligibility should be confirmed prior to construction.

ADOT historic / scenic route(s). Nogales to Tombstone Highway; Parker Canyon Lake to Mountain View Highway; Patagonia - Sonoita Scenic Road.

Determination. Based on the foregoing, SHPO concurs with a finding of NO ADVERSE EFFECT pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5.

This determination is non-final until concurrence is received from all consulting parties. Should the scope of the undertaking change, please resubmit for re-review per 36 CFR 800.13.

Sincerely,

R. Alvarez
reviewer · Arizona SHPO
This letter was auto-drafted by SHOPP using the unified GIS layer set and the project’s submitted polygon. Final review and signature by the assigned reviewer is required before issuance.