Prototype·Built by Concourse for Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
← Back to project
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
State Parks Building · 1100 W Washington St · Phoenix, AZ 85007 · shpo@azstateparks.gov
Prototype letterhead — generated by SHOPP
March 11, 2026
BIA — Navajo Region
Attn: contact125@example.gov
RE: Section 106 Consultation, Emergency stabilization — Yuma Co. Phase I
SHPO File: PRJ-2026125 · Yuma County, AZ
Received: 3/11/2026 · Deadline: 4/10/2026

Dear contact125@example.gov:

The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed your emergency stabilization submission for the above-referenced undertaking pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.

Project description. SYNTHETIC demonstration record. Emergency stabilization submitted by BIA — Navajo Region.

Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE includes a polygon of approximately 103.35 km² centered at 33.2805°, -111.9408° in Yuma County, Arizona.

Federal nexus. The APE intersects the following surface management jurisdictions: Private Land (Private); Gila River Indian Res. (Indian Lands).

Tribal consultation. The APE intersects sovereign tribal land(s): Gila River Indian Community. Concurrent consultation with the appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(s) is required under 36 CFR 800.2(c)(2)(ii).

Flood hazard. The APE intersects FEMA flood zone(s) D, X.

Identified historic properties. The following NRHP-listed or eligible properties lie within or adjacent to the APE:

  • McCullough-Price House (NRIS 09000311)4.06 km from APE centroid.
  • Redden, Lowell, House (NRIS 85000407)6.78 km from APE centroid.

ADOT historic / scenic route(s). Quartzsite to Wickenburg to Phoenix to Globe to Show Low to Springerville.

Determination. Based on the foregoing, SHPO concurs with a finding of ADVERSE EFFECT, with stipulations pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5. Stipulations to protect contributing resources during construction shall be incorporated into the project design and monitored by a qualified historic preservation specialist.

This determination is non-final until concurrence is received from all consulting parties. Should the scope of the undertaking change, please resubmit for re-review per 36 CFR 800.13.

Sincerely,

K. Ito
reviewer · Arizona SHPO
This letter was auto-drafted by SHOPP using the unified GIS layer set and the project’s submitted polygon. Final review and signature by the assigned reviewer is required before issuance.