Prototype·Built by Concourse for Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
← Back to project
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
State Parks Building · 1100 W Washington St · Phoenix, AZ 85007 · shpo@azstateparks.gov
Prototype letterhead — generated by SHOPP
March 15, 2026
City of Flagstaff
Attn: contact128@example.gov
RE: Section 106 Consultation, Visitor center expansion — Maricopa Co. Supplemental
SHPO File: PRJ-2026128 · Maricopa County, AZ
Received: 3/15/2026 · Deadline: 4/14/2026

Dear contact128@example.gov:

The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed your visitor center expansion submission for the above-referenced undertaking pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.

Project description. SYNTHETIC demonstration record. Visitor center expansion submitted by City of Flagstaff.

Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE includes a polygon of approximately 101.70 km² centered at 34.6517°, -111.8690° in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Federal nexus. The APE intersects the following surface management jurisdictions: Private Land (Private); Coconino N.F (USFS).

Tribal consultation. The APE intersects sovereign tribal land(s): Yavapai-Apache Tribe. Concurrent consultation with the appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(s) is required under 36 CFR 800.2(c)(2)(ii).

Flood hazard. The APE intersects FEMA flood zone(s) X, D.

Identified historic properties. No NRHP-listed properties were identified within the APE based on the submitted documentation and our current geospatial data.

Section 4(f) considerations. 1 pre-1945 bridge(s) lie within 5 km of the APE; ADOT and FHWA Section 4(f) eligibility should be confirmed prior to construction.

ADOT historic / scenic route(s). Prescott to Flagstaff Highway.

Determination. Based on the foregoing, SHPO concurs with a finding of NO ADVERSE EFFECT pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5.

This determination is non-final until concurrence is received from all consulting parties. Should the scope of the undertaking change, please resubmit for re-review per 36 CFR 800.13.

Sincerely,

P. Denetclaw
reviewer · Arizona SHPO
This letter was auto-drafted by SHOPP using the unified GIS layer set and the project’s submitted polygon. Final review and signature by the assigned reviewer is required before issuance.