Prototype·Built by Concourse for Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
← Back to project
Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
State Parks Building · 1100 W Washington St · Phoenix, AZ 85007 · shpo@azstateparks.gov
Prototype letterhead — generated by SHOPP
March 14, 2026
AZ Dept of Emergency Mgmt
Attn: contact225@example.gov
RE: Section 106 Consultation, Bridge rehabilitation — Maricopa Co. Supplemental
SHPO File: PRJ-2026225 · Maricopa County, AZ
Received: 3/14/2026 · Deadline: 4/13/2026

Dear contact225@example.gov:

The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed your bridge rehabilitation submission for the above-referenced undertaking pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800.

Project description. SYNTHETIC demonstration record. Bridge rehabilitation submitted by AZ Dept of Emergency Mgmt.

Area of Potential Effects (APE). The APE includes a polygon of approximately 101.47 km² centered at 34.8411°, -111.9580° in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Federal nexus. The APE intersects the following surface management jurisdictions: Coconino N.F (USFS).

Flood hazard. The APE intersects FEMA flood zone(s) X.

Identified historic properties. The submission identified 1 historic property within or adjacent to the APE:

  • Broadway Bridge (NRIS 88001651) — recommended effect: No historic properties affected.

ADOT historic / scenic route(s). Prescott to Flagstaff Highway; Dry Creek Scenic Road.

Determination. Based on the foregoing, SHPO concurs with a finding of NO ADVERSE EFFECT pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5. Stipulations to protect contributing resources during construction shall be incorporated into the project design and monitored by a qualified historic preservation specialist.

This determination is non-final until concurrence is received from all consulting parties. Should the scope of the undertaking change, please resubmit for re-review per 36 CFR 800.13.

Sincerely,

P. Denetclaw
reviewer · Arizona SHPO
This letter was auto-drafted by SHOPP using the unified GIS layer set and the project’s submitted polygon. Final review and signature by the assigned reviewer is required before issuance.